Alternative Cancer Treatment - An unbiased discussion on the basic theories behind.

Anything recent? those range from 5 to 20 years old; you say the work continues to be done, so I was expecting more contemporary publications.

One should also reserve judgement on mouse model studies, after recent indications that they're not suitable for modeling human inflammatory response.

5 years is not old! Accounting for the age of modern medical sciences!

Newer articles should contradict the issues presented in the linked articles, that is, I find no "feature" articles contradicting the findings on omega fat acids, which makes them, no matter "old", valid!

If being not recent makes scientific studies invalid then MOST research would turn invalid just by age! I don't think it is a sound argument to disqualify medical and scientific research just by chronological reasons.

I would like to see some articles solidly arguing against the findings cited above.

About mouse modelling then we would have to bring down many chemotherapy developments which precisely and ordinarily started under such modelling schemes. By the same token, Alternative schemes have not gone through mouse model testing, rather under daring individuals which are trying those.
I notice testimonial proof is not appealing to audiences here as they are not part of an "organized test process", but also it is not justifiable to deny all testimonial proof in one stroke.
We have to search more...

Source: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=253554&goto=newpost

vince young evan longoria ryan seacrest kentucky derby beltane capitals john edwards